damigella: (Lesebrille)
[personal profile] damigella
First of all, go over to [livejournal.com profile] readingrat's post Fine Young Cannibals (awesome title btw), especially the analysis on the question "Can people change?" to which all I can add is applause. Read the comments, too.

I will instead rant freely about an issue that readingrat wisely decided to avoid: marriage.
I supposedly view this from the same perspective as House, namely as someone with no religious belief and no need to respect manners or customs.

Everybody mentioned what Chase said, but what I heard even louder was House's description of his agreement with Dominika: he marries her, and she does things for him. The wife as full-time servant of the husband.

In many countries (mine isn't one) being married to a homemaker gives you a tax advantage.
I've pissed off a number of people by saying that the state is financing men to get paid cleaning help, cooks, whores and possibly babysitters. I used almost the same words as House.

Usually the pissed-off people had been raised by stay at home moms, something unheard of when (and where) I was a child - all mothers worked, most of them part-time. I've slowly come to moderate my language, but I still think the state has no business financing coupledom, especially when it's only straight coupledom.

State marriage, as Chase correctly remarks, should have nothing to do with love; it's a free contract between consenting adults. It should cost society zero, giving the couple extra rights and duties at the same time.
If someone is bothered because to them marriage is a sacrament (it is in the Catholic religion at least) I'd be happy to change the name to civil union, and reserve marriage to private ceremonies with no legal value.
To me, House should be free to marry Dominika for purely monetary reasons; it's his business if, some time later, she dumps his sorry ass for someone her age and tries to squeeze as much alimony as possible from him.

And as a subrant, I think that in love physical fidelity is absolutely overrated in comparison to trust. I'm much more upset by Cuddy dumping Lucas so soon after their engagement than by Wilson and/or Taub sleeping around while married. Again, remember this is my militant socialist atheist viewpoint.

While we're talking about sex, I don't get what the point of House not sleeping with Dominika is supposed to be. That he's still in love with Cuddy? Like that stopped him from having all the prostitutes last episode. That he might want a real relationship with his "wife" and so doesn't want to treat her like a whore? She's nice and everything, but she's not a doctor, and the idea of her being around until the end of the season (and possibly in S8) is annoying. Maybe he just finished the Viagra and is too full of Vicodin.

I was only mildly entertained by the toys (sedgway, helicopters, monster truck) and by the pedicure. I did like the tabletennis differential - still not a replacement for my beloved h/w foosball conversations. It was great, if not completely believable, to see Cuddy back to her usual role.

Wilson had a normal season 7 part - which would have been a very minor one in seasons past. This is a Huddy season, in the sense that H/C interaction is the focus even when (now that?) they are not together (anymore?). House may marry Dominika for a number of good reasons, but the only purpose of the wedding ceremony is to piss Cuddy off. Yes, all this has been said better by readingrat and in comments there, including that Cuddy shouldn't be present at all, but it bears repeating.

Some jokes were fine, some dialogs too but overall I'm so not impressed. Even the pill-popping seems more a (Masters-)annoying ritual than a need born from intense physical pain.

As for the POTW, all I can do is recommend [livejournal.com profile] cellista_in_c 's "darkish!wilson" hilarious fic Dinner At The Loft.

I think it's high time to roll up our sleeves :-) and contribute to the Kickin' It Old School Challenge. Let the DVDs roar!

PS: The userpic of House with reading glasses comes from [livejournal.com profile] julefontane. Many thanks!

Date: 2011-03-25 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damigella-314.livejournal.com
"Even the most monogamous person still has occasional fantasies"
Precisely. Especially while staring at pictures like coconut_ice22's icon above :-).

Date: 2011-03-25 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chocolate-frapp.livejournal.com
Hugh w/ doggie eyes and no shirt! NOM

Profile

damigella: (Default)
damigella

November 2011

S M T W T F S
  123 45
678910 1112
131415 1617 1819
202122 23242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 09:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios